Just so everyone knows: I’m not interested in soft-pedalling quotes, ideas, and comments just because someone might get offended. Don’t like it, don’t read it. On with the show.
aaronbarr:
Sup motherfuckers, I’m CEO of a shitty company and I’m a giant media-whoring cunt. LOL check out my nigga Greg’s site: http://rootkit.com/
And with those words began the most hilarious 24 hours of my, admittedly short, Twitter existence. One Aaron Barr, it seemed, had irritated the wrong people: they are smarter, more skilled, had a far better sense of humour, and one of them was a 16 year-old girl. In short, Mr Barr was pwned. This was soon followed by my first favourite tweet:
aaronbarr:
LOL I AM TWEETING SUCH BATSHIT THINGS IT’S ALMOST AS IF ANON HAS HACKED ME: http://vocaroo.com/?media=v4cjgXe63PVDI92uR
And so they had. What followed was deliriously funny, as well as highly informative. Not, to be sure, in the manner which Mr Barr had intended: he was pursuing a Tantalusian effort of ‘finding the leadership of Anonymous’. He seemingly wanted fame from being the hot-shot dude who helped bring in the super-epic-secret Leaderz to face the punishment for their supposed crimes. In the end, though; “All your Barrs are belong to us“.
I’ve observed that many media outlets are trying to cast the ‘attack’ on Mr Barr as an act of desperation, for fear of the ‘inner circle’ being ‘revealed. Nothing could be further from the case, and anyone who bandies that thought about is both ignorant and an ideologue. There is no ‘inner circle’ of Anonymous; there are no membership cards. One doesn’t pay one’s dues and then get the official Guy Fawkes mask with autographed D&D card in the mail a few weeks later.
In the worlds of Anonymous, they did it for the lulz, not in self-defence. The idea of cracking a cyber security firm’s servers, and its executives’ various internet accounts, mostly for the fun of it seems to escape the media. But more importantly, what many, if not most, media reports of Mr Barr’s castigation have missed, is what happened to Mr Barr’s research: the list which launched 24 hours of delight.
To set the record straight, Anonymous released Mr Barr’s ‘research’, which I call the ‘Leaderz List’. Download it here. If you’d also like to get an idea of other facets of Mr Barr’s life, and the internal workings of his employer, HBGary, you can get a ~4 GB torrent of all that fun stuff.
Before moving on, let’s first consider that infamous list, and see what its qualities are. Reading through the list it seems to be little more than a Nixonian “Enemies List” hodge-podge of people who Mr Barr felt was ‘involved’ in Anonymous. There is no ‘evidence’ which I can detect, just a badly formatted table stuffed full of baseless assumptions. Nowhere can I see how these people are serious members of Anonymous, much less part of some vast international conspiracy of an ‘inner circle’.
In passing, I’d like to congratulate Ms Edith Komes on having been sufficiently ‘involved’ to make Mr Barr’s brain whirl with fantasies of finding the ‘inner circle’. Ms Komes, by the way, is the source of the excellent Big List of WikiLeaks, which you can read here. Anyone who knows the enthusiastic but cybernetically challenged Ms Komes, would know that to put her on a list of Anonymous ‘insiders’ speaks volumes about Mr. Barr’s incompetence, and confirms for me that his list is the garbage that Anonymous claims it to be. I’d also like to announce I’m highly pissed off that I didn’t make it on the list, although I hope to rectify that in the future, as Mr Barr continues his ‘research’ and finds this essay dissing him.
Moving right along.
Some of the less dim-witted detractors of Anonymous – you know who you are – have been quick to use this release of the ‘Leaderz List’ as an example of how Anonymous is ruthless and will offer up its members as meat to placate the lions. The release is nothing of the sort: Anonymous is making a very well-considered point.
This is simply a list of people who ‘like’ Anonymous-related pages on Facebook, have Guy Fawkes masks for display pics, and perhaps chat time and again on AnonOps IRC channels. Several named individuals (Daily Kos, Crikey) have come out to express dismay that they were targeted – and I use that term purposefully – by Mr Barr. Mr Barr is more a threat to national cyber-security than this lot, since his incompetent firm apparently is on the government payroll in the service of – you guessed it, national cyber-security.
What this ‘Leaderz List’ is, is far from research: it is a list for systematic bullying. Even if Mr Barr is being honest when he insists that he was not going to release the information to the FBI – which I take with hefty block of salt – he was still going to pursue those people as part of his tracking down the ‘inner circle’. These are people who are innocent of any crimes, and have done nothing more than exercise their right to ‘like’ Facebook pages, enjoy Guy Fawkes masks, and chatter on IRC.
Cyber-stalking, anyone? Thanks to a certain troll [EDIT: oops, the troll done gone got hisself deleted. You can still admire his weirdy-beard here] on the Facebook WikiLeaks discussion board, I’ve got some news: if Mr Barr used Facebook to gather any information on his list, he’s violated Facebook Right and Responsibilies Section 5.7! Awesome! He’s doing one of the things I didn’t to, but I got kicked off of Facebook, and this bloke is still there! By the way, thanks for the heavy lifting on reading the Facebook rules, John. I couldn’t have made this post without you.
Had this list remained secret, and had it ended up in the hands of the FBI, a case of creepy cyber-stalking would have morphed horrifically into a situation where people, without being charged with any crime, would have nonetheless become suspects. The FBI would have almost certainly brought certain facets of the Orwellian PATRIOT Act to bear against these people, and they would never have known it.
Anonymous, therefore, did not throw these people to the wolves, but rather ensured that they receive due process. The people listed by Mr Barr now know they were being stalked, but more importantly, the ability of the FBI to pursue these people via the despicable PATRIOT Act has been hampered. If the FBI were to still pursue these people, it will politically motivated by the strange desire to ‘do something’, and not based upon any notion of due process.
In essence, by releasing that list, Anonymous ensured that Habeas corpus would be enforced. Additionally, it revealed to depths to which the US government and its allied henchmen will sink in order to find what they are looking for. Since it is logistically impossible to round up every person who uses a Guy Fawkes mask as a display pic, or chats on AnonOps, and torture them, why not randomly target the ‘likely suspects’. People like Ms Komes, because of their earnest activity and support, became recast in Mr Barr’s sick world as criminals.
[EDIT 09.02.2011]
Check out this excellent article from Crowdleak about the delightful Mr Barr and his band of merrily incompetent men!
[another edit}
HBGary were planning ‘attack strategies‘ with Bank of America against WL supporters like Glenn Greenwald. WikiLeaks is now mirroring the final version of HBGary’s proposal.
This from WL-Central: unless HBGary is working for Homeland Security and/or the FBI, what the company proposed seems of dubious legality.
[EDIT 10.02.2011]
The firm Palantir has publicly disowned its cooperation with HBGary, and Aaron ‘Superspy’ Barr by extension. This is a complete validation of Barrgate! This shows that the Anonymous-released information is completely accurate.
[/edit]
[EDIT 11.02.2011]
Some dorkwad on Twitter has deleted all those hilarious threads. Oh, I guess that would be Aaron Barr. You can follow the ‘real’ Aaron Barr here.
If anyone wants the original Anon tweets from @aaronbarr, I have a copy; it’s like a trip down lulzy lane. If you want your own copy, pop me an email, which you can find on Contact Me.
[/edit]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Edith Komes
11/02/2011
Hello Andrew,
great story on the Aaron Barr case. You are a very talented writer. I had never heard the expression
“cybernetically challenged” before but bursted out in laughing when I first saw your piece.
Here is another small example of just how great a challenge it is for me to get anything technical to work.
This is a little conversation that I have had with someone on vimeo:
Hi Jonathan,
Good to hear that your in it. Is a great project. About the nervous……well that is typical behaviour for me. Not only while taping video’s. You know I bought the videocam especially for this project. When I got home could not get the thing to upload the battery. Went back to the store twice to fix that. It turns out I had stuck the cable into the wrong opening……haha
So much for my technical abilities.
@Andrew,
Thank you very much for the great job that you are doing with this.
I am about to go translate Tangerine’s letter into Dutch that way people in the Netherlands can participate in the project. Some very interesting people signing in on her project at Revolution Truth.org
Have a nice weekend,
LG,
Edith
Andrew McInnes
12/02/2011
Hi Edith,
Thank you very much! I’m glad you enjoyed the little joke. 🙂
LOL your story is hilarious! I think that just goes to show how truly incompetent Aaron Barr really is. His so-called ‘research’ was just taking down a list of names to buy him some credibility with the FBI. He probably hoped to be in a new, cushier job before the FBI got around to figuring out his ‘Leaderz List’ was bogus. Or…. perhaps the FBI would never have discovered that, either! Maybe Anonymous saved the FBI from its incompetent self!
How’s that for a fun thought?
Best,
–Andrew
Anon
25/02/2011
yeah me just a grandma. I been making fun of stupid CEO. Posting news is a crime now and reading it.
Edith Komes
11/02/2011
P.S.
There are rumours on Facebook that Aaron Barr is still hanging around under the alias of Julian Goodspeak.
Black picture of course and amazingly 150 people on his friendslist. Not everyone is aware who it is that is
hiding behind that profile.
In admissable in court has got to be an understatement. But who knows we might get to a point where Sarah Palin and her Tea Party companions are calling out for Facebook Users to be assasinated because it is
impossible to prosecute them, and since the deathpenalty is not an option for non US citizens, just go
and illegaly kidnap, torture and murder them. It is not like that has not been done before.
The only thing new about it is the motive: Having a profile on Facebook and beeing a too obvious WL supporter.
Andrew McInnes
12/02/2011
I’ve heard that there is a shadowy figure like Mr ‘Goodspeak’. If that is really Aaron ‘Superspy’ Barr’s ‘research’ account, then most likely Barr has simply abandoned it.
Yes indeed about the motive you mention! You’re proof of that, I think: you have a profile, you’re “too active” and you’re “too obvious”. What a terrible president to set, although now we all know about it. It’s time to do something to make this insanity stop!
Anon
25/02/2011
I found him on my wall and so did others on my lists.
Andrew McInnes
03/03/2011
You’re not the only person to end up on the list! Another poster here had her name appear in Mr Barr’s delightful little project. She is, by her own admission, technologically challenged. 🙂
So, I wouldn’t be surprised if you end up on such a list. Anyone and everyone is a suspect now; we’re guilty until proven merely suspicious.
Thanks for posting!
–Andrew
Edith Komes
13/02/2011
Well actually in my particular case there is much more going on then the fact that I am an actieve Facebook user.
The US Government has tortured and murdered my DAD. Exposure for me always means a possible future embarrassment for the US Government. So why not put me on the Terrorist Watchlist straight away to silence a possible witness of earlier committed torture and murder by the US Government.
Edith Komes
13/02/2011
I do not believe that Aaron Barr had any idea that he would by accident stumble on to a witness of earlier wrong doings by the Pentagon on Facebook.
One of the reasons that I am not at all worried about the FBI: If the FBI where to seriously investigate my computer/phone and otherwise connections. They would very soon end up running into the Pentagon/Nato/CIA/ and BND/ AIVD shit that is already hanging in my line and following me around very regularly.
I am very curious as to how far the FBI wishes to take that investigation. As I have been busy trying to press criminal charges against a US General for the earlier mentioned torture and pre-medidated murder that I am a witness to.
Edith Komes
13/02/2011
Lets just see how far the rabbit hole goes……………
Edith Komes
13/02/2011
By the way, I have send a mailing to the US Senate last summer. So there is not one single Senator in the USA that does not know who it is that I am talking about. So does Donald Rumsfeld. So do Bill and Hillary Clinton.
I am a celeb inside the Pentagon. The do not always admit it. But I am very much looking forward to the day when your government finally decides to come clean or your media finally decide to really investigate.
Edith Komes
14/02/2011
Hello Hail Xenu,
I just had a look at the link that you gave and posted it on my wall on Facebook. I hope that you do not mind as it will get you more traffic from potential interested Facebook Users. But it will also place in the picture of the other “Pentagon Superspy’s for Hire” sounds a bit like Rent-A-Cop doesn’t it ? So, I hope that you can handle the attention and are cybernatically clever enough to notice when you have really strange stuff peak into your website.
If you do not at all like the attention, then please let me know so that I can remove it from my wall.
It is not the idea to get every user onto another government watchlist. I noticed during chats on Facebook that there are some Anon enthousiastic 13-years old that stay up way past their bedtime to chat on FB. I do not want them on all sorts of lists without their knowledge. As I seem to be part of the inner circle without my knowledge.
I am wondering how on earth I could have ever hacked into anyone’s computer. As I had never heard of Aaron Barr before this little incident that was meant to create more PR for his “bleep firm”.
Andrew McInnes
15/02/2011
Hi Edith,
Thanks for posting a link to my blog! I appreciate it very much 🙂
I’m not terribly worried about the blog. *If* it were taken down, I have everything saved elsewhere. Plus, I never mind rewriting things, because it keeps the ideas sharp.
As you are indeed cybernetically challenged, Aaron Barr is completely retarded. Apparently government contractors don’t have anything better to do with their time than pursue innocent people!
Anon
25/02/2011
My name is on the list and I had anon friends because I was in Scientology and there were pickiters. I Picketed the church once and the nice person that is now my friend I picketed with said dont the goverment has better things to spend money on this this list. I just post news and tell people of the Venus Project.
I was told my name was on this list but I did not know where to find it till here. I see it I am listed as friends.
My crime is posting news and being a former cult member.
Thank you Anon. when you guys protested the church years ago I knew you would be out here doing this and i had no idea you would save me.
I am a grandma who reads and post news. I have 7 grandkids and I am for the Venus Project.
When the BP oil spil hit that is when I really started to post the news and since most people that were in the church had anon friends I accepted some too and I keep up with the news.
I as informed by a former church member my name is on this list and list. I understand most were like me and I do recognize a few others as my FB friend church protesters on the list. My name is more listed as a friend which should not be as we all have zillions of friends.